Office and residential buildings are seen in this file photo dated Aug. 17, 2024. 鈥 PHILIPPINE STAR/MIGUEL DE GUZMAN

By Luisa Maria Jacinta C. Jocson, Reporter

LOWER INTEREST RATES will help drive the entry of more foreign direct and portfolio investments into the Philippines, analysts said.

鈥淭he outlook for foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign portfolio investment (FPI) in the Philippines appears promising, with current trends suggesting the country could meet or potentially exceed the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas鈥 (BSP) targets,鈥 Security Bank Corp. Chief Economist Robert Dan J. Roces said in a Viber message.

The BSP expects to record FDI net inflows of $9.5 billion this year. For foreign portfolio investments, it forecasts $3.1 billion in net inflows by yearend.

鈥淭he BSP鈥檚 forecast for the year sounds reasonable, as it wouldn鈥檛 be too far a stretch, with that sort of level of annual FDI coming into the Philippines almost consistently over this period, barring the coronavirus-hit year in 2020,鈥 Pantheon Macroeconomics Chief Emerging Asia Economist Miguel Chanco said in an e-mail.

In the January-to-May period, FDI net inflows jumped by 15.8% year on year to $4.024 billion, data from the BSP showed.

Meanwhile, short-term foreign investments yielded a net inflow of $1.46 billion in the January-July period, surging from the $157.3-million net inflows in the same period a year ago.

FDIs are considered long-term investments, while portfolio investments or 鈥渉ot money鈥 are seen as more fickle due to the ease by which these funds enter and leave the economy.

Ruben Carlo O. Asuncion, chief economist at Union Bank of the Philippines, Inc., said the BSP鈥檚 investment targets are doable amid easing interest rates.

鈥淥ffering attractive rates will be the key. All around will be declining key rates, thus, offering sensible investments now will lock in gains for prospective investors. I would like to believe that there is time,鈥 he added.

Mr. Roces said the further reduction in policy rates this year and next year 鈥渟hould stimulate investment activity, particularly for FDI, by making borrowing more attractive.鈥

At its August meeting, the Monetary Board cut rates for the first time in nearly four years or since November 2020. It reduced borrowing costs by 25 basis points (bps), bringing the benchmark rate to 6.25% from the previous over 17-year high of 6.5%.

The central bank could also deliver another 25-bp rate hike in the fourth quarter, BSP Governor Eli M. Remolona, Jr. said earlier.

The US Federal Reserve is expected to start its easing cycle later this month, which also bodes well for investor sentiment, analysts said.

鈥淭he biggest catalyst for FDI and FPI into the country is the expected series of Fed rate cuts that could be matched locally, thereby leading to improvements in global investments, trade, and other economic activities,鈥 Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. Chief Economist Michael L. Ricafort said in a Viber message.

Apart from reduced borrowing costs, analysts said that the country鈥檚 strong macroeconomic indicators will help attract more investments.

鈥淜ey drivers for achieving these targets include sustained economic fundamentals, political stability, an improved regulatory environment, ongoing infrastructure developments, and the country鈥檚 competitive advantages in sectors like BPO (business process outsourcing) and manufacturing,鈥 Mr. Roces said.

Mr. Asuncion said investors are likely to be attracted to the Philippines because of its upbeat economic growth.

鈥淚f foreign investors see real opportunity in investing in the Philippines, I do not think it will be a huge problem getting these investors on board,鈥 he added.

The Philippine economy grew by 6.3% in the second quarter, marking the fastest growth in five quarters or since the 6.4% in the first quarter of 2023.

On the other hand, Leonardo A. Lanzona, Jr., an economics professor at the Ateneo de Manila University, said that lower borrowing costs may favor short-term investments over long-term ones.

鈥淭he low interest rates of BSP can stimulate economic activity. However, this can only boost short-term investments as borrowing becomes cheaper,鈥 he said in an e-mail.

鈥淚t can depress long-term investments if the returns on longer-term projects are deemed insufficient relative to the risks.鈥

Mr. Chanco also cited risks to this investment outlook, noting the country鈥檚 鈥減olicy stasis.鈥

鈥淭he Philippines鈥 nearest neighbors and biggest competitors remain quite aggressive in their pursuit of more open trade borders and a better infrastructure environment for businesses, something that the Philippines is still struggling with,鈥 he added.

The government鈥檚 policies may also benefit short-term investments, Mr. Lanzona said.

鈥淎lso, the government implements policies or incentives that encourage immediate spending or investment, such as tax breaks or stimulus checks. These policies can boost short-term investments but may not have the same impact on long-term projects that require sustained funding and are subject to continuous risks,鈥 he said.

Mr. Ricafort also noted that the investment targets remain achievable, barring any further geopolitical risks.

鈥淗owever, global economic conditions and exchange rate stability will also play crucial roles. While the current trajectory remains positive, risks such as geopolitical uncertainties and domestic policy changes will have an impact on these projections,鈥 Mr. Roces said.

Mr. Ricafort also noted that the country鈥檚 improving credit rating outlook will also support foreign investment growth by boosting the confidence of international investors and creditors.

Japan-based Rating and Investment Information, Inc. last month upgraded the Philippines鈥 investment grade rating to 鈥淎-.鈥

The country also secured an 鈥淎-鈥 rating from the Japan Credit Rating Agency but has yet to secure an 鈥淎鈥 rating from the 鈥渂ig three鈥 credit raters.

The Philippines currently holds a 鈥淏aa2鈥 rating from Moody鈥檚 Ratings, 鈥淏BB鈥 from Fitch Ratings, and 鈥淏BB+鈥 from S&P Global Ratings.

The government is targeting to achieve an 鈥淎鈥 rating by the end of the Marcos administration.