Former MRT-3 head Vitangcol found guilty of graft
THE PHILIPPINE鈥橲 anti-graft court has convicted Al Sanchez Vitangcol III, former Metro Rail Transit-Line 3 (MRT-3) general manager, and his uncle-in-law, Arturo V. Soriano, for graft and violations to the government鈥檚 procurement law over the rail system鈥檚 maintenance deal in 2012.
In a decision promulgated on January 31, the Sandiganbayan Third Division said Mr. Vitangcol acted with 鈥渆vident bad faith鈥 by entering into a maintenance contract with Philippine Trans Rail Management and Services Corp. (PH Trams) and neglected to disclose that Mr. Soriano is one of the company鈥檚 incorporators.
鈥淚n this case, accused Soriano is clearly in conspiracy with accused Vitangcol III. He knew from the start that his firm has dealings with DOTC (Department of Transportation and Communications) wherein his nephew-in-law, accused Vitangcol III, is a member of the BAC (Bids and Awards Committee) and team leader of the Negotiating Team, among others. Yet, he did not divulge this relationship to the Board of Directors of PH Trams and to the BAC,鈥 part of the decision reads.
During the case proceedings, Mr. Vitangcol argued that when he discovered Mr. Soriano is one of the incorporators of PH Tram, he immediately contacted him about his involvement.
In response, Mr. Soriano claimed that he already divested his shares in the company by executing a Deed of Assignment dated September 10, 2012, which transferred all his shares and interests to co-accused Marlo de la Cruz, the chairman of PH Trams.
Mr. Vitangcol said he then 鈥渇irmly believed鈥 that Mr. Soriano was no longer connected to PH Trams.
The Sandiganbayan, however, was not persuaded saying that 鈥渁ccused Vitangcol III, although admitting knowing one of the incorporators of PH Trams to be a relative by affinity, chose to remain silent during the entire procurement process.鈥
鈥淭o Our minds, this is a clear breach of his sworn duty as a public official.鈥
The court also asserted that Mr. Vitangcol failed to verify Mr. Soriano鈥檚 claim.
鈥淔urthermore, accused Vitangcol III could have easily determined, with some reasonable due diligence, whether co-accused Soriano remained connected with PH Trams or had indeed divested himself of any interest therefrom. A mere representation or say-so from accused Soriano was not enough,鈥 the decision said.
The two are sentenced to an 鈥渋ndeterminate penalty ranging from six years and one month, as minimum, to eight years, as maximum鈥 in prison.
They have also been penalized with 鈥減erpetual absolute disqualification鈥 from holding public office. 鈥 Genshen L. Espedido


