THE Department of Finance (DoF) said it maintains that earnings of Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGO) are taxable, contrary to statements issued by the Office of the Solicitor General.

Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III said that according the Bureau of the Internal Revenue (BIR), a taxpayer鈥檚 income can be taxed where the service is rendered, making an offshore gaming firm operating in the Philippines subject to Philippine income tax.

POGOs typically take bets from Mainland clients, where they can also enforce collection on clients who suffer from losses.

鈥淭he BIR issued an opinion to this effect months ago saying that the situs of income is where the services are rendered,鈥 Mr. Dominguez told reporters in a phone message.

He also reiterated that BIR is the agency authorized to interpret the provisions of the Tax Code.

鈥淭he same is true for VAT (value-added tax), which also is imposed on services rendered in the Philippines,鈥 he added.

The Philippine Star reported on Monday that Solicitor General Jose C. Calida wrote to the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (PAGCOR) and the BIR, saying that POGOs cannot be taxed here based on the 鈥渟ource of income鈥 principle.

Mr. Calida, according to the report, argued that even though POGOs are based in the Philippines, the bets are taken outside the Philippines.

Representative Jose Ma. Clemente S. Salceda of Albay鈥檚 second district said Mr. Calida鈥檚 letter 鈥渞ises to the level of (granting) a tax exemption,鈥 which he said is a power reserved for Congress.

鈥淭here is value added or income derived here, therefore taxable. Basic accounting principle — costs are recognized when revenues are recognized. So aren鈥檛 the wages here costs expensed by POGOs,鈥 Mr. Salceda said in a statement yesterday.

Currently, POGOs must pay a 5% franchise tax as per BIR鈥檚 revenue memorandum circular 102-2017 issued in December 2017.

According to PAGCOR Chairperson and CEO Andrea D. Domingo, Congress should pass a new law clearly defining the POGOs鈥 tax obligations.

鈥淚n absence of any clear law covering the taxability of the income of the offshore-based POGO operators, then the opinion of the OSG (Office Solicitor General) would be prevailing. But of course, if Congress (could pass) a law clearly providing for the tax accountabilities of POGO operators,鈥 Ms. Domingo told reporters in a phone message Monday.

The DoF has been pressing the industry to withhold and remit personal income taxes of workers employed by POGOs and has shut down several non-compliant POGOs and service providers. — Beatrice M. Laforga