REUTERS

WASHINGTON 鈥 Internet companies Google, Amazon and Cloudflare say they have weathered the internet鈥檚 largest-known denial of service attack and are sounding the alarm over a new technique they warn could easily cause widespread disruption.

Alphabet Inc-owned Google said in a blog post published Tuesday that its cloud聽services had parried an avalanche of rogue traffic more than seven times the size of the previous record-breaking attack thwarted last year.

Internet聽protection company Cloudflare Inc said the attack was 鈥渢hree times larger than any previous attack we鈥檝e observed.鈥 Amazon.com Inc鈥檚 web聽services division also confirmed being hit by 鈥渁 new type of distributed聽denial聽of聽service聽(DDoS) event.鈥

All three said the attack began in late August; Google said it was ongoing.

Denial聽of聽service聽is among the web鈥檚 most basic form of attack and it works by simply overwhelming targeted servers with a firehose of bogus requests for data, making it impossible for legitimate web traffic to get through.

As the online world has developed, so too has the power of聽denial-of-service聽operations, some of which can generate millions of bogus requests per second. The recent attacks measured by Google, Cloudflare and Amazon were capable of generating hundreds of millions of request per second.

Google said in its blog post that only two minutes of one such attack 鈥済enerated more requests than the total number of article views聽reported by Wikipedia during the entire month of September 2023.鈥 Cloudflare said the attack was of a magnitude that 鈥渉as never聽been seen before.鈥

All three聽companies聽said the supersized attacks were enabled by a weakness in HTTP/2 – a newer version of the HTTP network protocol that underpins the World Wide Web – that makes servers particularly vulnerable to rogue requests.

The firms urged聽companies聽to update their web servers to ensure that they do not remain vulnerable.

None of the three聽companies聽said who was responsible for the聽denial-of-service聽attacks, which have historically been difficult to pin down.

If cleverly aimed and not successfully countered, such attacks can lead to widespread disruption. In 2016, an attack attributed to the 鈥淢irai鈥 network of hijacked devices hit domain name聽service聽Dyn, disrupting a swathe of high-profile websites.

The U.S. government鈥檚 cybersecurity watchdog, CISA, did not immediately return a message seeking comment. 鈥 Reuters