PHILSTAR FILE PHOTO

By Kyle Aristophere T. Atienza, Reporter
and Alyssa Nicole O. Tan and Russell Louis C. Ku

REQUIRING people to get vaccinated against the coronavirus may lead to political divisions and tarnish the credibility of the government鈥檚 pandemic response, according to analysts.

鈥淢andatory vaccination has no legal basis and may even be violative of some persons鈥 human rights,鈥 Party-list Rep. Carlo Isagani T. Zarate said in a Facebook Messenger chat. The state is partly to blame for vaccine hesitancy because it needs to educate people about it, he added.

鈥淭he problem is that the administration has enforced military solutions and has not performed to control the pandemic鈥 he said. 鈥淣ow, they plan to force and scare people into getting vaccinated, instead of convincing them with a good explanation.鈥

Last week, vaccine czar Carlito G. Galvez, Jr. said he was in favor of making coronavirus vaccinations compulsory, otherwise Filipinos would be at risk.

Mr. Zarate cited the need for information campaigns 鈥渟o that more Filipinos would see the importance of vaccination in the fight against this pandemic.鈥鈥淧ublic health education is key.鈥

鈥淔orcing people to get vaccinated does not take into consideration the fact that there are actually still more people who really want to get vaccinated,鈥 said Maria Ela L. Atienza, a political science professor at the University of the Philippines.

A poll conducted by the Social Weather Stations from Sept. 27 to 30 showed that 64% of adult Filipinos were now willing to get vaccinated against the coronavirus, up from 55% in June.

The government wants to increase the number of vaccinated people 鈥渟o that they can claim it as an achievement,鈥 Ms. Atienza said in a Viber message. 鈥淭hat is why they want to make it mandatory.鈥

鈥淭here may be legal challenges in court should this proposal push through,鈥 she added.

More businesses around the world have been prioritizing fully vaccinated job seekers. Critics have said making employment conditions based on vaccination status is highly discriminatory.

In the Philippines, business groups have been urging the government to allow the private sector to impose stricter requirements on unvaccinated employees and patrons, and to decline unvaccinated job applicants.

Last month, President Rodrigo R. Duterte said government workers who refuse to be vaccinated should resign.

A bill seeking to make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory is pending at the House of Representatives.

Health Undersecretary Maria Rosario S. Vergeire has said compulsory vaccinations would help the country achieve herd immunity.鈥

Ramon Lorenzo Luis 鈥淩enzo鈥 R. Guinto, a medical doctor and associate professor of global public health at the St. Luke鈥檚 Medical Center College of Medicine, said the right to refuse vaccines is not absolute 鈥渆specially if there is a strong case for improving the overall public welfare 鈥 including the health of the one being immunized.鈥濃

鈥淚n a health emergency such as this pandemic, the government can argue that this temporary suspension of the right to choose can lead to lifelong protection of health and of that same right to choose,鈥 he said in a Facebook Messenger chat. 鈥淚f you die of COVID-19, there is no more right to choose, no human rights, no civil liberties to enjoy.鈥

Mandatory vaccinations could lead to boycott and lowered business income, said Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr., head of think tank Minimal Government Thinkers.

The state should let businesses impose vaccination policies on their own if necessary and face the consequences, he said in a Viber message.

Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) President Benedicto V. Yujuico in an e-mail said the group favors both the 鈥渘o vaccine, no entry鈥 and 鈥渘o vaccine, no work鈥 policy.

He also said there is no need for legislation to enforce the policy, which he said could fast-track economic recovery through increased consumer confidence.

Mr. Yujuico said people have a right to choose not to get vaccinated, but 鈥渋t is not their right to contaminate and expose others to COVID.鈥 鈥淭herefore, they must accept the consequences of being unvaccinated for the good of the majority.鈥

Michael L. Ricafort, chief economist at Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. said the positives of mandatory vaccination outweigh the negatives in terms of economic impact.

This would lead to a further reopening of the economy, create more jobs and livelihood, he added.

Gene A. Nisperos, a board member of the Community Medicine Development Foundation, said forcing people to get vaccinated is wrong 鈥渓egally and ethically.鈥 He added that the state鈥檚 vaccination program is flawed.

鈥淲e respect patient鈥檚 rights and uphold their autonomy,鈥 he said in a Viber message. 鈥淎t the very least, intake of medicine is part of shared decision-making. Thus, convincing the patient thru painstaking explanation is key.鈥

Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP) spokesman Alan A. Tanjusay said low vaccine supply in some provinces remained a problem.

鈥淢any. of the workers are willing to get vaccinated but they have accessibility problems,鈥 he said in a Viber message.

He added making vaccination mandatory could worsen discrimination against unvaccinated workers.

鈥淚t鈥檚 discriminatory and unfair to workers who have a difficulty accessing limited and inadequate supply of vaccines, and to employers and business owners who can鈥檛 buy vaccines for their employees,鈥 he said.

The Philippines aims to give out as many as 1.5 million vaccine doses daily starting Nov. 20. The government has started inoculating children aged 12 to 17 years old and is planning to vaccinate children below 12 years next year.