By Noel Vera
DVD Review
The Neon Demon
Directed by Nicolas Winding Refn
Nicolas Winding Refn鈥檚 The Neon Demon provokes as many questions as it does responses: is it a horror thriller? An existential comedy? A condemnation of the LA fashion scene or a stylization and glamorization? Feminist or misogynist? Is it part fantasy or part sick fevered dream?
I say all of the above and none; if anything I鈥檇 call it a somewhat exaggerated contemporary documentary on modern-day Los Angeles, a timely rectal temperature reading if you like of the City of Angels, with the thermometer thickly smothered in a hallucinogenic lubricant beforehand.
I鈥檇 heard the film called 鈥渟hocking鈥 and 鈥済ruesome鈥 and 鈥済orgeously shot and lit鈥 and licked my lips in anticipation; I never expected it to be so funny. Androgynously named Jesse (Elle Fanning) pops up in the city so clueless and clean you feel as if you can send her out to milk the cows in the early morn; instead she has a series of encounters with increasingly decadent urban citizens, each of which fall under her spell 鈥 instead of corrupting her, they participate in her; they buy what she鈥檚 offering and lift her up to the next level of celebrated supermodelhood.
Everyone wants what Jesse鈥檚 offering 鈥 that鈥檚 the basic premise. Photographers stare at her; fashion designers stop fiddling around and take a closer look. Makeup artist Ruby (Jena Malone) offers to connect Jesse to some crucial folk and later a place to stay; casual boyfriend Dean (Karl Glusman) and motel clerk Hank (a hilariously grimy Keanu Reeves) have designs on her, alternately conventional and rapacious.
And Jesse stays above it all; perhaps part of the spell she casts is her freshness, her virginity if you like, and in this film it鈥檚 all about virginity: in the 16th century, sex with virgins was considered a cure for widespread syphilis and gonorrhea, the same century when Elizabeth Bathory (inspiration for one particularly gory scene in the film) reportedly tortured and bathed in the blood of virgins to preserve her youth (she probably just tortured and drank blood; the bathing story was tacked on afterwards). Incidentally it was also in this century that physician and proto-anatomist Andreas Vesalius first named the skin covering the vaginal opening the 鈥渉ymen鈥 which makes you wonder: what is it about this time period and virginity anyway?
Of course there鈥檚 always the most famous virgin in history, and her power to intercede on our behalf 鈥 her purity being a consequence of her high status (or is it the other way around?).
Never mind the cursory characterization or minimal dialogue; never mind the implausibility of some of the more outrageous acts depicted (which depend for their credibility on how willing or unwilling one is to dismiss some of the darker rumors about LA). Refn is spinning a fable, with generous helpings of Mario Bava, Gaspar Noe, and David Lynch, and taps into the medieval potency of old (and unabashedly sexist) myths.
Refn enlists Mary Laws and playwright Polly Stenham to cobble together a 鈥渟cript鈥 鈥 more a series of scenes of Jesse ascending up the pyramid of Angeleno success, purely on the basis of her purity. It鈥檚 a feminist script if you like 鈥 the men lounge about and make all the momentous decisions (including one violent if largely implied act of sexual assault) but the women are the livelier creatures who chafe under, endure, bask in the male gaze. And look at each other. And calculate who鈥檚 winning the most attention, who鈥檚 dominating that very gaze. And plot and calculate some more. 聽 聽
It鈥檚 arguably a feminist script but the director is male and it鈥檚 his gaze that confers power and beauty and horror. Elle Fanning is a lovely actor, but she鈥檚 just one of many in a cast studded with beauties; what singles her out and transforms her is Refn鈥檚 adoration, and under his focused stare she鈥檚 incandescent. She absorbs his attention and glows with it, and the light pouring out is sensual and relentless and not a little obscene.
Interesting note: at one point (skip the rest of this paragraph if you plan to see the DVD) Jesse starts buying into the myth gathering about her (鈥淚 don鈥檛 want to be like them; they want to be like me鈥) and at least one critic feels she鈥檚 less beautiful in that moment. I disagree; if anything Jesse鈥檚 less human beforehand: sweet, unspoiled, unaffected by her meteoric rise 鈥 a Candide-like innocent ripe for spoilage. When this stain of egotism of self-regard spreads throughout her immaculate papyrus of a character suddenly she鈥檚 a flawed person filled with hubris and humanity. Suddenly she鈥檚 palpably real 鈥 she鈥檚 there 鈥 and our (and Refn鈥檚) desire for her is sharper than ever.
Is The Neon Demon a great film? Is it even a good film? Not sure. At least Refn is upfront about his misogyny and inability to write female characters (unlike say Quentin Tarantino who鈥檚 repulsively opportunistic in the way he both deifies and degrades women). It鈥檚 at least something to look at, and definitely not boring.

