Digital Reporter

Ah, service charge: our favorite excuse not to tip. It is often an unwelcome surprise that comes at the end of a (hopefully) delicious meal at a nice, sit鈥慸own restaurant. It serves as a mandatory tip of sorts, an additional 8% to 10% computed from your original bill. How many times have you gone over the receipt, searched for the magic words and exclaimed, 鈥淥h, there鈥檚 service charge. No need to tip!鈥?

But is this service charge really going to your waiter鈥檚 pockets, just as how the tip works?

If we go by the Labor Code of the Philippines,聽聽has this to say: 鈥淎ll service charges collected by hotels, restaurants and similar establishments shall be distributed at the rate of eighty鈥慺ive percent (85%) for all covered employees and fifteen percent (15%) for management. The share of the employees shall be equally distributed among them. In case the service charge is abolished, the share of the covered employees shall be considered integrated in their wages.鈥

If you and your friend go to a caf茅 that charges a 鈧100 additional service charge for food that costs 鈧1000 (sans value added tax), 鈧85 of that should be split between all of the restaurant staff that made your scrumptious meal, and 鈧15 goes to the restaurant owner.

But in an informal survey of restaurants ran by聽SparkUp聽in Quezon City, asking wait staff鈥攅ver so politely鈥攊f they really聽do聽get their 85%, their response is that it鈥檚 the other way around. Almost all of the service charge, around 85鈥90%, according to the staff, actually go to the owners of the establishment. The leftover, 10鈥15% gets split between the rest of the waiters and kitchen staff. Going by our 鈧100 service charge example earlier, 鈧90 of that would go to the owner. Assuming that our hypothetical caf茅 employs five more people, they get a measly 鈧2 each for their hard work.

That arrangement, said attorney and former restaurateur Mark Brian Dela Cruz, could be perfectly legal, as long as the employees knew about the arrangement beforehand.

鈥淲hat is under the Labor Code鈥85% for the staff and 15% for the management鈥攊s the minimum standard,鈥 Mr. Dela Cruz explained in a phone call to聽SparkUp. 鈥淚t is there unless the employers convey to the employee that 90% goes to the management and 10% goes to the employees, and they accept it in their contract.鈥

鈥淏y virtue of that stipulation in their contracts, the employees know that they have not been shortchanged by their cut in the service charge,鈥 he added.

Mr. Dela Cruz said that he used to manage a small restaurant with only one outlet, so the 85%鈥15% split in the Labor Code was amenable to him. But it might be unfair to larger establishments. 鈥淚f you are a big restaurant or a big chain of restaurants, you can not afford the 85%鈥15% split because you have to account for operational costs. It鈥檚 hard to compare the operations of big restaurants to small ones. You have to look at the bigger picture.鈥

So perhaps it鈥檚 time to reconsider tipping the waiters for their hard work. If you have the extra cash, what鈥檚 a few pesos to show your appreciation to all the work that goes into your dining?

Tipping isn鈥檛 mandatory in our culture, but it would certainly be greatly appreciated (Emily Post has an extensive guide to tipping聽). There鈥檚 an aphorism that goes: If you can鈥檛 afford to tip, you can鈥檛 afford to go out and eat.