Senate panel calls for review of oil deregulation
THE Senate energy committee has backed the Energy department鈥檚 call for greater transparency in the pricing of petroleum products by proposing a review of the oil deregulation law, after a court blocked the agency鈥檚 circular that required oil companies to 鈥渦nbundle鈥 fuel prices.
鈥Matagal na rin ang (It鈥檚 been a while since the passage of the) oil deregulation law so it鈥檚 about time to revisit [it]. Again, the promise of the oil deregulation law is more competition will lead to lower prices. We should also analyze whether that promise is being achieved right now,鈥 Senator Sherwin T. Gatchalian, chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy, told reporters after a hearing on electric vehicles on Wednesday.
Asked about when he plans to file a resolution calling for a review of Republic Act No. 8479 or the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1998, he said: 鈥Siguro mga (about) one month from now.鈥
Mr. Gatchalian was reacting to a court issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction against Department of Energy (DoE) Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi, who was respondent to a case filed by Petron Corp. questioning the legality of DoE Department Circular No. DC2019-005-008.
鈥淭o rectify that, what we are discussing internally is to revisit the oil deregulation law and to incorporate there transparency, kasi ang punto naman ng (because what is being pointed out by the) DoE is transparency,鈥 he said.
Mr. Gatchalian said the DoE would want to know whether the industry players were hoarding or were deliberately not selling oil when prices increase.
鈥淭hey want to also understand whether the industry take is beyond reasonable terms although you can argue that is a deregulated and private endeavor but we also need to understand the dynamics of industry take,鈥 he said, referring to the price mark up for each seller of fuel products.
鈥淏ut the bottom line is that there is transparency,鈥 he added.
He said although the industry is deregulated, oil is a 鈥渧ital鈥 industry that could dictate the operation of vehicles, airlines and sea vessels.
鈥淕overnment should know exactly the operations and the inventories of the oil companies,鈥 he said.
On Tuesday, Mr. Cusi said the DoE will continue to look for ways to keep consumers informed about what goes into the prices of petroleum products, after a court blocked the agency鈥檚 circular that it hoped would provide greater transparency.
鈥淚鈥檓 not happy,鈥 DoE Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi told reporters after the release of the writ of preliminary injunction issued by Branch 213 of the Regional Trial Court of Mandaluyong City that sided with petitioner Petron Corp.
He said the other ways for the DoE to determine the pricing of fuel products would include the importation of petroleum by a unit of state-led Philippine National Oil Co. or the company itself.
Separately, the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) plans to review the DoE circular although it was non-committal whether it would proactively come up with a stand on the matter.
Kenneth V. Tanate, PCC executive director, said oil unbundling is generally good for consumers as it would promote transparency and make them more informed on what they are paying for. — Victor V. Saulon


