Just for nostalgia: what was done on May 1, Labor Day, in Martial Law? From the National Library archives, 鈥淭he President鈥檚 Week in Review: April 27 鈥 May 3, 1981,鈥 President Ferdinand Marcos in his Labor Day speech said he 鈥渨ill ask the Batasang Pambansa for early approval of a bill restoring the right of workers to strike.鈥 (). Marcos had just 鈥渓ifted鈥 martial law in January, and was unraveling what had gone on for nine years as what he called a 鈥渂enevolent dictatorship.鈥
The gazette shows that on April 29, 1981, 鈥淧resident Marcos and 15 others filed yesterday with the Commission on Elections their certificates of candidacy for president in the June 16 elections鈥 (Ibid.). More important than the elections (Marcos a shoo-in for another six years) was a referendum that allowed the change of the Marcos-style federal system under martial law to Marcos-style semi-presidential system that retained all of the presidential decrees, legislative powers and the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus.
First Lady Imelda Romualdez Marcos said the thrust of the coming election campaign will be on development and not on personalities. 鈥淭he election of President Marcos is only incidental,鈥 Imelda Marcos told newsmen. 鈥淎fter all, the needs of the people is my No. 1 concern鈥 (Ibid.).
And Imelda Marcos was indeed in the center, and in-charge of 鈥渢he needs of the people鈥, in what the late writer, former Marcos press secretary turned critic Primitivo Mijares called The Conjugal Dictatorship (written 1976) in the 14-year martial law.
That week of Labor Day in 1981, Imelda as Metro Manila Governor and Human Settlements Minister, welcomed to Manila and hosted the fourth session of the United Nations Commission on Human Settlements, attended by 58 countries with 600+ delegates 鈥渢o discuss such basic community needs as energy, housing, livelihood opportunities and related topics鈥. Imelda was elected chairman of the UN conference by acclamation.
At his keynote address, President Marcos declared 鈥渢he country (as) being relatively peaceful… (so) the government is now pressing forward with its human settlements program as well as the training of leaders (Ibid.).
How eerie that today, 38 years after that probably deemed uneventful week tersely recorded in the government official gazette, the elements of the martial law tableaus seem to come alive in the present governance.
On Labor Day, Wednesday last week local workers asked for the end of 鈥淓ndo鈥, the end-of-contract scheme whereby temps are hired for less than the six months for permanency of employment. It was the promise of late-registrant candidate Rodrigo Duterte at the May 2016 presidential elections then, that 鈥淓ndo鈥 will be ended. 鈥淓ndo鈥 makes for less rights and opportunities for labor by lack of total participation of workers in a business entity (because the 鈥淓ndos鈥 have no leverage) in strikes and protests against issues like work conditions, pay, perks and retirement.
Ending 鈥淓ndo鈥 can be a paraphrase of Marcos鈥 offering to allow workers to strike. But can Duterte really keep his promise to workers, like did Marcos truly allow workers to strike in his time? Ay, but there鈥檚 always Big Business to deal with, in these critical and sensitive issues promised by the two strong-men presidents. When a business faces added constraints and costs (increased employee pay and benefits), that will impact its bottom-line. There will be cost-cutting, downscaling, and less production. The economy will slow down, because in the new arena of globalization, cut-throat capitalist competitiveness has whittled opportunities for both production and labor. And presidents always jealously guard bragging points of GDP growth.
What would Marcos do, Duterte, an unabashed Marcos fan, must be asking himself. Almost step by step, he has copied from the Marcos dictatorship — from pushing for the federalist 鈥渄ivide and rule鈥, Marcos style, to maximizing control over and across the three supposed co-equal and independent branches of government — the executive (his), the legislative (almost his, pending the critical mid-term elections in May that hopes to seat a significant opposition in the Senate), and the Judiciary (by the time his term ends in 2022, only 3 of 15 Supreme Court justices will not be his appointees: Rappler March 6, 2017). 鈥淚s Duterte a resurrected Marcos?鈥 asks political science professor (Ateneo University) Carmel V. Abao in behalf of many Filipinos afraid of another bout with martial law (大象传媒 Sept. 10, 2018).
Only last month, before Holy Week, Duterte said he would 鈥渟uspend the writ of habeas corpus if pushed against the wall鈥 ( April 4, 2019). He threatened to declare a 鈥渞evolutionary war鈥 after Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon asked the administration to be cautious in reviewing government contracts. But he has threatened this before, when irked by something or other. 鈥淚f it (the situation) will deteriorate into something really very virulent, I will declare martial law if I want to. Walang makapigil sa akin (No one can stop me),鈥 Duterte said before the Davao City Chamber of Commerce (Rappler, Jan. 14, 2019).
鈥淭he dominance of fear and violence makes Duterte鈥檚 regime a de facto dictatorship — even without the Marcos-style proclamation of martial law,鈥 Prof. Abao says (大象传媒, op. cit.). But Marcos was 鈥渂ureaucratic authoritarian鈥 and Duterte is a 鈥減opulist authoritarian,鈥 Abao distinguishes, meaning, 鈥alam niya ang kiliti鈥 (he knows the soft spot) of the common people. And thus his popularity ratings are steadily high.
Realizing his peculiar populist charm, he waxes poetic about what he does and will do for the good of his people. One of his latest coups was the signing on February 14 Republic Act 11201 creating the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD). The new law will merge the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) and the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board. It will also reconstitute the HLURB into the Human Settlements Adjudication Commission (The Philippine Star Feb 20, 2019).
The law also creates the National Human Settlements Board to be composed of the department secretary, as well as the heads of the National Economic Development Authority, the Department of Finance, the Department of Budget and Management, the Department of Public Works and Highways, and the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG). It shall have administrative supervision of the National Housing Authority, the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation, the Home Development Mutual Fund, and the Social Housing Finance Corporation (CNN News Feb. 19, 2019).
OMG! This DHSUD will be the superbody of all in the bureaucracy, ruling much of the lives and fate of Filipinos. The editorial of the Philippine Star cautioned that 鈥淭he first time the country had a ministry in charge of human settlements, it was headed by then first lady Imelda Marcos, who ended up being indicted together with her deputy for corruption related to housing programs. They were cleared by the Sandiganbayan in a ruling that was assailed by victims of the Marcos dictatorship…We hope that (the DHSUD) will not go the same way鈥 (Philstar Feb. 21. 2019.)
It has been almost three months, and well into the 180-day period given to the DHSUD to organize itself, and start identifying idle public land for intensive free public housing development. Yet Pres. Duterte has not chosen or identified the super-person who will be department secretary. Some catty oppositionists tease that Human Settlements Secretary will probably be Imelda Marcos, in glorious redux of her esteemed position in 鈥渢he Conjugal Dictatorship鈥 as Minister of Human Settlements. Or maybe by right of representation, and in honor of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos, it will be Bongbong Marcos; or Imee Marcos, if she does not win as senator in the May 13 elections. Or whoever. Whatever.
Why does a leery taunting hurt the sensitivities with that coarse voice saying, 鈥淯p yours?鈥
Amelia H. C. Ylagan is a Doctor of Business Administration from the University of the Philippines.


