By Noel Vera
Movie Review
Citizen Jake
Directed by Mike de Leon
MIKE DE LEON鈥檚 first film in 鈥 has it been 18 years? 鈥 has to be an event; the latest from one of our finest filmmakers, in the same league as Lino Brocka, Mario O鈥橦ara, Ishmael Bernal, Celso Ad. Castillo. If it鈥檚 arguably the weakest feature he鈥檚 done to date (hopefully not his last) it still stands head and shoulders above most anything out there today, Filipino or Hollywood.
Citizen Jake tells the story of Jacobo 鈥淛ake鈥 Herrera (Atom Araullo) and right away De Leon has to riff on the keyboard: we have Jake seated at the computer typing and Jake walking down a hallway simultaneously, taking a seat and addressing us. We have archival footage of Jake鈥檚 beloved Baguio City where he lives in self-exile; flash-forwards to characters we have yet to meet; shots of the film crew shooting the very scene we鈥檙e watching; bits of dialogue laid out across the screen.
The film is part documentary on the City of Pines, part crime mystery (a young girl found raped and murdered), part political intrigue, part (as the director himself admits) autobiography (Jake鈥檚 tense relationship with his father Jacobo Herrera, Sr. [Teroy Guzman]). De Leon shuffles the various elements to the rhythm of his inimitably crisp editing style (actual cutting by Gerone Centeno and Tom Estrera), and you can鈥檛 help but feel you鈥檙e in the hands of a master. This is a Mike de Leon film we鈥檙e seeing and with it come expectations: that it be impeccably shot (by Dix Buhay) and acted, with high-quality (if modestly budgeted) production values (Mike Guison and Cesar Hernando) and a lovely lilting soundtrack (Nonong Buencamino). A good team 鈥 some of the names are legend 鈥 and a guarantee that we are going to be thoroughly entertained.
Only De Leon doesn鈥檛 seem to want to settle for 鈥渆ntertainment鈥 鈥 more like 鈥渋nformation overload.鈥 He throws at you a brief history of Baguio: how the city was established as vacation spot for our American overlords, how they exploited the native population, how that exploitation continues today in the form of 鈥減ony boys鈥 (native youths grooming horses for tourist rides) and house servants (for vacation homes the owners live in only a few months of the year). He throws at you a withering precis of the abuses of the Marcos dictatorship, from human right violations to killings to lurid sex scandals. And he throws at you a selection of the more memorable political intrigues, lightly coated with fictionalized names.
Along with the history lesson is an entire film appreciation course tucked away in the corners of each shot (A poster of Costa-Gavras鈥 Z; a running gag where Roxie keeps alluding to the Godfather films [thinking he鈥檚 Sonny but suspecting he鈥檚 really Fredo]; a photographer-turned-investigator hero a la Blow-Out; alternate eyewitness accounts a la Rashomon; a home invasion scene a la Clockwork Orange; Kurosawa wipes; text spread in the Godardian manner across the big screen; images that recall Coppola, Antonioni, Leone, Dreyer; Jake鈥檚 house 鈥 the same American Colonial residence where De Leon shot Kung Mangarap Ka鈥檛 Magising; the playing with medium and message as in his film essay Bayaning Third World; the film鈥檚 very title, a nod to Welles鈥 most famous film).
Does it all get overwhelming? De Leon doesn鈥檛 seem to want to make it easy; if anything he expects you to keep up. While you鈥檙e at it, don鈥檛 forget Jake鈥檚 uneasy feelings towards childhood friend and houseboy Jonie (Luis Alandy), his disintegrating relationship with girlfriend Mandy (Max Collins), his longstanding trauma from the disappearance of his mother Victoria (Dina Bonnevie). There won鈥檛 be a quiz, but there will be a few answers by film鈥檚 end.
It鈥檚 as if De Leon had bottled up everything he wanted to say for 18 years and let it all out in a prodigious flood; he鈥檚 doing his best to shape and shoot and cut it into some kind of coherent form and can hardly manage the flow. If anything, this film鈥檚 chief flaw is that it鈥檚 too generous, that there鈥檚 material here for perhaps three films and two hour-long documentaries; maybe De Leon shouldn鈥檛 have waited so long to start working again. The film lacks the simplicity of means, the eloquence of meaning of his greatest work Kisapmata, which is personal (as in 鈥 yes 鈥 autobiographical) and universal (as in able to happen in the house next door) and complex (metaphor for the fascist nature of patriarchal Filipino society) and simple (story of a family gone very wrong) all at the same time.
But there are, I submit, worse things in the world to be accused of than overreaching; this is a mighty meal, barely contained within its 137-minute running time. Some of the performances help clarify the storylines and histories (Was the plotline of Chinatown coherent? But John Huston鈥檚 Noah Cross helped clear the confusion: watching him you know the Devil is real and wears a white suit). Anna Luna鈥檚 Heidi is simple and affectingly direct; Ruby Ruiz鈥檚 Manang has melodramatic authority; Collins鈥 Mandy conveys a sense of understated grace (especially in her last scene with Jake); Raquel Villavicencio鈥檚 lovely little cameo as Miss Merci bears witness not just to the crime (or one aspect of it) but to a bygone era; Nonie Buencamino鈥檚 brief appearance as Judge is intense and movingly human; Cherie Gil鈥檚 Patricia Medina gives us cynical sophisticated decadence with a bitter personal edge.
I remember watching Lou Veloso鈥檚 performance of Anton Juan鈥檚 Taong Grasa (Street Bum) where he held an audience mesmerized for over an hour while presenting (all on his own, mind) the thoughts, the feelings, the world of the homeless. Here he plays poet-professor Lucas, holding the viewer mesmerized as he presents 鈥 in a brief scene, in verse he wrote himself 鈥 the vision of a rich land with teeming soil, sea, sky. 鈥淭he Pearl of the Orient,鈥 where the corrupt and abusive are 鈥渨hipped for each soul (they鈥檝e) harmed鈥 and the people who have benefited must 鈥渂e of service to (their) land.鈥 Truisms galore but when Veloso delivers them and De Leon quietly shoots him (from a corner of the caf茅, slouching on a chair) the words have the heft and feel of epiphanies.
But with De Leon it almost always comes down to family: the source of comfort and strength, of anguish and despair. It鈥檚 in the scenes down in Manila in the Herrera family mansion that the film comes truly to life, as Jake confronts his daddy dearest, his Alpha and Omega, his b锚te noir. It鈥檚 where De Leon gets unsettlingly personal as he digs into his knowledge of the emotional dynamics of powerful old families. Atom Araullo sometimes falters as an actor (he struggles to inject energy in Jake鈥檚 moments with Mandy) but he鈥檚 fine suggesting the love that can exist between two men who call each other brother (Jake and Jonie) and he鈥檚 magnetic suggesting the shame, guilt, resentment, yes, even hate, that can exist between privileged son and tyrannical father. 鈥淭his country is best ruled by the elite!鈥 declares Teroy Guzman as Jacobo, Sr. (who not only matches Araullo鈥檚 intensity, he, in my book, can stand beside Brando without embarrassment). 鈥淏y strong men!鈥 And to Jake鈥檚 dismay he knows exactly what his father鈥檚 words mean even as he loathes their very meaning 鈥 he鈥檚 learned to wield power and influence himself, as a way of moving his investigation forward. You might say every sin he commits up in Baguio, his father (he ultimately learns) has already committed, on a much larger scale, down in Manila.
And even in the finale (skip this paragraph if you plan to see the film!) there鈥檚 a kind of double-edged awareness to Jake鈥檚 solution to the three-way confrontation that takes place in his father鈥檚 palatial dining room/living room: he does what he does because he knows he can. He strikes a blow for what he believes is immediate justice knowing that if he had shot the gun in the other direction nothing could save him from the consequences. Despite all his continued defiance, despite his life after (which is kept deliberately ambiguous), he鈥檚 still his father鈥檚 son 鈥 he鈥檚 too smart not to figure out the angles.
From Treb Monteras II鈥檚 Respeto to Lav Diaz鈥檚 Panahon ng Halimaw to this, we鈥檝e seen three responses to the Duterte regime to date 鈥 and may more be on their way. While none can or should be considered a definitive knockout 鈥 I doubt if anyone has the resources to suggest the scale of the abuses we鈥檝e seen 鈥 each tries to cover differing aspects in their own brilliant way: Respeto through the angry rhythms of a rap artist, Panahon from the ground-level view of a poet being pushed, however, reluctantly to become a warrior. Jake could be their upper-class brother, yet another wanna be artist-poet (he doesn鈥檛 recite any, but I鈥檒l bet his blog includes a few verses) looking down from his privileged vantage point, feeling the angst of someone who has the education and intelligence and power 鈥 someone very much like us in fact 鈥 to act, yet has failed to do so. One of the better films of 2018.